Pages

Monday, April 11, 2011

Desiring both Sustainability & Growth


Our vision is to create a business that is good for the planet and good for the health of its people.
- Chris Morrison, Managing Director, Phoenix Organic ltd[1]

Introduction

Tension between a desire for continued growth for a company and an emphasis, within that company for a sustainable approach to business, is nothing new. Such tensions are at the heart of sustainability and the conflict between, what Nick Brooks calls, “the so-called “environmental movement” and the supporters of rapid economic globalization based on corporate capitalism.”[2] Mr. Brooks, writing for the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, goes on to say that, the philosophy of “growth at all costs is currently most strongly associated with “sink or swim” capitalism in which individual enterprise is sacred and in which the proper role of the state is to facilitate innovation rather than provide for the needy.”[3] This philosophy is characterized as one of two extremes in the debate between growth and sustainability. The other extreme, is what Mr. Brooks calls, the deep green model. This model is based on the notion that “humanity should coexist with nature and have as little impact on the Earth as possible. In contrast with the maximum growth philosophy, in which consumption and innovation form a virtuous cycle, consumption is minimal and innovation is regulated, viewed in purely utilitarian terms. As opposed to constant change in pursuit of linear progress, the deep green philosophy seeks an equilibrium between humanity and the natural world, and is therefore based on stability rather than change.”[4]

Case Study: Phoenix Organic

The Natural Step, a Swedish Non-profit that is “dedicated to education, advisory work and research in sustainable development” had this to say summary of Phoenix to say. Beginning in 1985 when Chris Morrison purchased a ginger beer bug from a friend, Phoenix originally “would collect empty beer bottles from pubs, soak them in the bathtub, and then take them to a local café for sterilizing. Finally the bottles were filled with ginger beer and left for a week or two to ferment. The original product was label-free and sold in local cafes and health food shops. During the first year Roger Harris joined Phoenix and the ‘Ginger Fizz’ line was born. Ginger Fizz, a naturally fermented beverage, had a mind of its own and was quite often determined to get out of the bottle before the top was cracked! The original vision for Phoenix products was to produce and distribute only organic food and beverages. Unfortunately there was neither the demand from consumers nor the supply of raw materials to sustain this vision. A compromise was reached by producing the best possible alternatives - that being organic wherever possible, but with the bottom line of being 100% natural.”[5]

Valuing Sustainability – Growing your Business

According to Case Studies in Sustainability Management and Strategy: The oikos collection, “by May 2004, Phoenix Organic had grown from its bathtub beginnings with its ginger fizz product 17 years earlier to become New Zealand’s leading manufacturer of premium certified organic and natural beverages. It had done so while living up to its founders’ vision of creating “a business that was good for the planet and good for the health of its people.” Yet, despite a growth rate of 25% over the last three years, sales were still only NZ$6.5 million. Having carved out a strong niche in the New Zealand non-alcoholic beverage industry, the question was how to produce future growth—through new products such as the chai Phoenix had launched, through new channels such as supermarkets, through developing overseas markets such as Australia or Malaysia, or through some combination of all of these strategies? The challenge focuses on how to combine economic growth with the Phoenix philosophy: being good for the planet and also good for people’s health.”[6]

The Bottom Line(s)

Despite the exceptional growth that Phoenix Organics was experiencing, “Social and environmental sustainability was one aspect of the business that Morrison, also Chair of New Zealand’s Sustainable Business Network, was unwilling to compromise on.”[7] Authors Eva Collins, Steve Bowden and Kate Kearins go on to say that “even in the bathtub days, the three founders always tried to make their products in an ethical manner, providing a healthy, natural premium product with the least impact on the environment. They believed that the market had caught up to their early thinking. “In the last 10 years we’ve seen more interest from the market in things that are important to us – safety, accountability, values, integrity and sustainability,” Morrison said.”[8] Over the years, as Phoenix’s sustainable business strategy evolved it sought structure for its continued growth. In 1999 Phoenix was introduced to The Natural Step and later that year became the “first company in New Zealand to adopt The Natural Step framework for sustainability and have used this to guide decision-making”[9] ever since.

Conclusion
Since its beginnings back in 1985, Phoenix has made some notable achievements in the field of sustainable business management. With clear intent and desire to both understand and implement sustainable strategies in its company, Phoenix has shown what even a small company can do to make a difference in the business world and the issue of sustainability. Even more notable is the company’s continued commitment to sustainability at every stage of the growth process. Challenged with the seemingly incongruous parallel of a company’s desire to pursue sustainability and a need for financial growth, Mr. Morrison sums up this point by saying “I believe that there are some significant issues related to sustainability for business that get beyond a certain point.”[10] Despite, or perhaps in-spite of these ‘significant issues’, Phoenix has been able to balance these equally challenging tasks and emerge both a pioneer in sustainable business integration for New Zealand, but also a successful international business.




[1] http://www.naturalstep.org/sites/all/files/TNS_Phoenix_Organic.pdf [2] http://www.nickbrooks.org/publications/TynBNote08.pdf [3] http://www.nickbrooks.org/publications/TynBNote08.pdf [4] Ibid. [5] http://www.naturalstep.org/sites/all/files/TNS_Phoenix_Organic.pdf [6] Hamschmidt, Jost, ed. Case Studies in Sustainability Management and Strategy: The oikos collection. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 2007. Page 19 http://www.phoenixorganics.co.nz/ [7] Hamschmidt, Jost, ed. Case Studies in Sustainability Management and Strategy: The oikos collection. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 2007. Page 60. [8] Hamschmidt, Jost, ed. Case Studies in Sustainability Management and Strategy: The oikos collection. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 2007. Page 60. [9] http://www.naturalstep.org/sites/all/files/TNS_Phoenix_Organic.pdf [10] Hamschmidt, Jost, ed. Case Studies in Sustainability Management and Strategy: The oikos collection. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 2007. Page 52.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Ethics, Sustainability... & News Corp?



Introduction
Companies around the world are focusing more and more on ethical business practices and specifically corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives to remain competitive in a change business world. The global business environment is slowly changing through a combination of societal demands, consumer wants, and dwindling natural resources. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) defines Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as “the continuing commitment by business to contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the community and society at large.”[1] Within this context, CSR can be a powerful force for change toward a sustainable business model for the future.

In addition to being sustainable, CSR is also an ethical effort made by corporations. The Internet Encyclopedia on Philosophy states that the field of ethics “involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior.[2] While it may be presumptuous to say that sustainability and CSR are the ‘right’ behaviors for companies to be pursuing, it is clear to see that the future will continue to incorporate more and more of these behaviors.

Case Study: News Corp

According to News Corporation’s website, “News Corporation is the globe’s leading publisher of English-language newspapers and their digital brands, with operations in the U.K., the United States, Australia, Papua New Guinea and across Europe and Asia. The Newspaper and Information Services segment includes News International, which publishes four national newspapers in the U.K.; News Limited, which publishes almost 150 national, capital city and suburban newspapers in Australia; the New York Post and Community Newspaper Group in the U.S.; The Wall Street Journal and its many related publications in the U.S., Europe and Asia; and Dow Jones. News Corp. also publishes several special interest magazines in Australia.[3] News Corp decided, in 2007 to “embed the values of energy efficiency and environmental sustainability into all of our businesses — for the benefit of our communities and our bottom line.[4]

The action plan and how it represents strategic planning for ethical results

In 2007, News Corp made it an ethical and sustainable priority to make itself carbon neutral. Under the Global Energy Initiative section of News Corp’s website, News Corp recognizes that their impact “extends beyond the bounds of our own operations, but our core responsibilities - and key opportunities - lie within our own walls. Some of our businesses use more energy than others, but our strategy everywhere is the same:
  • First, reduce our use of energy as much as possible.
  • Then, switch to renewable sources of power where it makes economic sense.
  • And, as a last resort, offset emissions we can't avoid.”[5]
These commitments to sustainable business are consistent with News Corp ‘Standard of Business Conduct’. It states News Corp’s “has a firmly established policy of conducting its affairs in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and observing the highest standards of business ethics. Integrity, honesty, forthrightness and fairness are of primary importance in all business relationships involving the Company.” It goes on to say that theChief Executive Officer and senior financial officers to promote honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure; and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations.[6] While News Corp’s efforts to manage an ethical administration that utilizes sustainable business practices, whenever possible, might have caught some off guard, there is at least one group it hasn't. The Carbon Disclosure Project has been getting companies to voluntarily report their carbon emissions annually since for years.

The manner of selecting proper goals

While being the first carbon neutral media company in the world is a note-worthy accomplishment, the chairman of News Corp noted in a published memo that, “achieving net zero carbon emissions was never our only goal. Less than four years ago, I invited all of our employees, business partners and audiences to join us in this exciting initiative — and your response has been extraordinary. Today, I'm pleased to share some of our successes across the Company, as well as our long-term commitment to environmental sustainability.[7] Some of the successes that he was referring to include: improving the energy efficiency of the company’s day-to-day operations, industry leadership to the community at-large, and produce media content that “prove that passionate environmental messages can be fodder for both blockbusters and real-world action.”[8]

Monitoring processes to insure goals



With regard to News Corp’s goal of carbon neutrality, News Corp has utilized both internal and external controls to ensure appropriate benchmarks were being made and being reported accurately. Since fiscal year 2006, News Corp has measured the “carbon footprint of our global operations, providing insight into the carbon reduction and energy efficiency opportunities at each division. As a last resort, we offset emissions we cannot avoid.”[9] In partnership with Clear Carbon Consulting, a full-service firm renowned for its expertise in carbon and energy analysis, News Corp collected energy usage and cost data from its businesses and calculated its total annual greenhouse gas emissions, News Corp has been able to compile its internal carbon disclosures. Because of this partnership it has been easier to evaluate the transparency and disclosure of its analysis for other external parties like Carbon Disclosure Project. Committed to accelerating solutions to climate change, Carbon Disclosure Project has, since 2000, been actively soliciting companies to voluntarily submit reports on their emissions on an annual basis. “News Corp has consistently ranked high in the Carbon Disclosure Project's annual reports. Last year [2010] it was the leader in the consumer discretionary category and second compared to all companies in the S&P 500 who disclosed their emissions.[10]

Transparent reporting and who this benefits

Upon receipt of a voluntary report the Carbon Disclosure Project reviews the documentation and assesses an overall ‘score’ to the report. Scoring is “applied to most of the company responses to CDP, which are assessed for their level of disclosure. A high carbon disclosure score would indicate a comprehensive response. The response would tend to show clear consideration of business-specific risks and potential opportunities related to climate change and good internal data management practices for understanding GHG emissions. However, the disclosure score does not reflect a company’s actions on climate change mitigation.[11]

Global 500: Top companies recognized on both the Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index and the Carbon Performance Leadership Index

The companies highlighted in green are those that have been in the Global 500 CDLI for three consecutive years.
Company
Carbon disclosure score
Carbon performance score
Sector
Siemens
98
A
Industrials
Deutsche Post
97
A
Industrials
BASF
96
A
Materials
Bayer
95
A
Health Care
Samsung Electronics
95
A
Information Technology
Lafarge
94
A
Materials
News Corporation
94
A
Consumer Discretionary
Philips Electronics
94
A
Industrials
National Australia Bank
93
A
Financials
Praxair
93
A
Materials
Reckitt Benckiser
93
A
Consumer Staples
Royal Bank of Scotland Group
93
A
Financials

S&P 500: Top 10 companies recognized on both the Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index and the Carbon Performance Leadership Index

Company
Carbon disclosure score
Carbon performance score
Sector
Consolidated Edison
96
A
Utilities
News Corporation
94
A
Consumer Discretionary
Spectra Energy
94
A
Energy
Praxair
93
A
Materials
Cisco Systems
92
A
Information Technology
Dean Foods
91
A
Consumer Staples
CSX
91
A
Industrials
Exelon
90
A
Utilities
PG&E
90
A
Utilities
Xcel Energy
89
A
Utilities
For 2010, News Corp ranked high in both carbon disclosure and carbon performance scores.


Standards for maintaining socially responsible results

While any company can lose momentum on its commitments and goals, be it sustainability of any other, it seems clear that Carbon Disclosure Project will provide the foundation and framework for News Corp to maintain their achievements in socially responsible reporting with regard to green house gases. Rupert Murdock the Chairman and CEO of News Corp, states that, “We are well on our way to becoming the innovative, regenerative business we want to be. In the long term, we aim to grow our business without growing our carbon footprint, to power our operations with clean electricity, to minimize solid waste to landfill from our production operations, and to continue to engage our audiences on sustainability issues through partnerships and content of the highest caliber.[12] The continued support of management within an organization is crucial for maintaining and improving on corporate social responsibility. While Mr. Murdock and Fox News reporting on climate change has been the source of much debate, it seems clear that, whatever the reason, News Corp seems committed to reducing green house gases and continuing to maintain a carbon neutral company into the future.
Conclusion

News Corp has made some amazing strides in recent years to make itself carbon neutral and make itself a leader within the media industry for socially responsible initiatives and sustainability goals. News Corp has “saved millions of dollars by improving the energy efficiency of our day-to-day operations. Our efficiency projects pay for themselves in less than two years, on average, and span from simple solutions like lighting retrofits and automatic PC shut-down to systemic changes like installing telepresence and videoconferencing technology to reduce the need for air travel," Murdoch wrote.[13] While, perhaps the least likely champion for sustainability initiatives and climate changing green house gases for the media industry, News Corp has shown what it considers to be an important business, and ethical trend. If actions speak louder than words, it should not be what News Corp says but rather what it does that’s memorable.