Pages

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Sustainable Development in Nigeria - Green Materials

Nigeria’s Intercontinental Education Community Center (ICEC2): Recently our TPA group had a meeting in Doylestown. The morning of the 13th at 7am found four from the SBA class in a café meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Ukazim who are the owners and promoters of ICEC2. During the two hour meeting Mr. and Mrs. Ukazim relayed the history of the project as well as its aspirations and goals. We decided that as this will be, among other things, a school and clinic that will be used year round it is important to consider materials inside the building envelope that contain few to no VOC’s and off-gas as minimally as possible. The project’s land has already been bought and is in the process of being fenced off for security reasons before construction can begin. The project is located at about 5° latitude and 9° longitude, the planned location of ICEC2 means that there will be over twelve hours of sunlight per day available for sustaining the building. While the approach to the materials differs dramatically from those being considered for the Newtown project there are still numerous ‘green’ materials that are being considered. Looking at case study in San Francisco called ‘scrap house’ goes a long way in understanding how much is still possible when you have a limited budget. Scrap house is located on a 90’ X 135’ parcel of land in front of San Francisco City Hall. If the name wasn’t telling enough the objective of scrap house was to create a house using nothing but scrap and salvaged materials. Some examples of salvaged scrap include furnishings like: the cardboard table & stool made out of recycled corrugated cardboard, salvaged floorboards, and heavy-duty cardboard tubes. The table was accompanied by a stool made of rolled and carved corrugated cardboard, topped with a comfy seat of wine corks.[1] For interior finishes include: the Phonebook Wall. Looking through Scrap House’s main entryway, visitors were greeted by a wall made of 1,500 phonebooks stacked vertically. The phonebooks were affixed to the sheet metal wall covering with two self-tapping screws drilled through the spine of the book. The phonebooks acted as insulation and helped with the acoustics of the main space.[2] And finally examples of exterior materials include Street Sign Siding. Street and traffic signed were used as siding for one entire exterior wall, some of which were visible from the interior. The signs were donated by the San Francisco Department of Public Works.[3]

Another case study with considerations important to green material in Nigeria was a Women’s Intercultural Center Being Built with Used Tires in Anthony, New Mexico[4] and others that reuse tires in construction. While there are fast becoming more ways and used to recycle or reuse tires there are still tons that go to landfills every year. Roughly 300 million scrap tires are generated each year in the United States alone[5] according to the Industrial Resources Council. Of that 300 million about 40 million tires end up in landfills. [6] Tire derived aggregate has very useful engineering properties that make these materials an excellent choice for construction applications like at the Women’s Center in New Mexico. In addition, tires have a high energy density and can be used as fuel to generate electricity. Nigeria is the largest producer of Rubber in Africa[7] and is a major production link for Michelin and Bridgestone for the fabrication of tires around the world. This means that tires may well be a viable, cost effective way to use a free or cheap commodity in the creation of ICEC2 that is also environmentally helpful. Tires can be used to make the wall of the building, as in New Mexico, or may be used as a cushioning material in playgrounds and other public areas popular with children, or even as a replacement of traditional concrete sidewalks. The feasibility of using tires as a fuel source may well turn out to be too costly of an endeavor for ICEC2. However as part of the schools focus is to “educating the whole person” which includes vocational training it may be a viable consideration as this manner of ‘tire fuel’ is often used in trade skills like glass, steel and concrete.



This is an Excerpt only and may not be copied or cited without permission, Please contact me directly to learn more.


Photos courtsey of: http://www.thereporteronline.com/articles/2009/01/05/news/srv0000004343733.txt
http://icec2.org/home.html
[1] http://www.scraphouse.org/Materials [2] http://www.scraphouse.org/Materials [3] http://www.scraphouse.org/Materials[4] http://www.laprensa-sandiego.org/archieve/june21-02/tires.htm [5]http://www.industrialresourcescouncil.org/Materials/ScrapTires/tabid/367/Default.aspx[6] Ibid[7] http://www.wrm.org.uy/bulletin/138/viewpoint.html#-%20Nigeria:%20Tyres%20at%20the%20expense%20of%20people’s%20livelihoods

LEED Silver in Newtown PA Green Materials


As the new Newtown Township building will be seeking LEED Silver designation it will use LEED standards to achieve accreditation, it is reasonable to assume that their building preferences will cater more toward LEED related sustainability.

The construction manager overseeing the townships project was gracious enough to give us their checklist of credits they believe they will earn and those they believe are either not possible or too costly to try and achieve. Of the 13 possible credits available for materials and resources under LEED-NC 2.2 (excluding possible ID credits M&R); the township building is only expecting to be awarded 6 credit points with 1 point in the ‘unsure’ category. While this is in part due to the construction being a new building as opposed to a renovation of an existing structure, the township is also not pursuing credits 3.1 & 3.2 materials Reuse, rapidly renewable materials, and FSC certified wood. This seems to be an unfortunate oversight on the part of the township. As a government entity that is attempting to make strides in their community for the promotion of sustainable development, Newtown Township is neglecting some key opportunities to stand out and further, not only the progressive nature of the new township building, but also to encourage local residents to follow in their stead. It is commendable in the first place to be pursuing a sustainable building, but why is only the minimum being pursued? The USGBC’s Reference Guide for New Construction states that this area of the northeast has some of the most “well-developed markets for salvaged materials”[1] in the country. Newtown is within 500 miles of Washington DC, Philadelphia, New York, Boston and others. There is enormous potential to utilize or even initiate programs that would not only benefit the community but also help Newtown Township achieve a higher LEED rating, potentially save on materials costs and be a local leader.

Reuters news agency in December of 2007 ran an article documenting the benefits to the community that the state of Pennsylvania was is receiving from its efforts to promote recycling and materials reuse programs. According to Governor Rendell, “Pennsylvania is home to more than 3,200 recycling and reuse businesses and organizations that generate more than $18 billion in gross annual sales and provide paychecks totaling $2.9 billion to more than 81,000 employees. Additionally, these businesses add more than $305 million in taxes to the state treasury.”[2] Bucks County alone accounts for nearly 85,000 dollars in grants from the state for recycling performance programs.[3] Considering the numerous materials reuse options just in Pennsylvania alone coupled with the fact that the project plans on achieving both credits 4.1, 4.2 & 5.1, 5.2, recycled content and regional materials respectively, why can’t they find a way to incorporate materials reuse into the sustainable characteristics of the building.

Newtown Township is also not planning on achieving MR Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials and credit 7 certified wood. While these are perhaps more understandable than materials reuse due to considerations of added cost they are never the less important considerations in making the building more sustainable while also contributing to LEED credits.
Other options worth considering include: installing energy star appliances where possible, grid pavers and pervious pavement and perhaps most importantly, Pennsylvania’s Renewable Energy Program Geothermal and Wind Projects Program Guidelines that was just released in January 2009. Available to municipalities as well as businesses, this new program allows for grant and loans to be awarded that contributes toward installing geothermal systems and wind turbines for energy production. While some might argue that this is something more relevant to energy instead of green materials, I would point out that there is significant material consideration with renewable energy. Additionally if a building is to be truly sustainable it needs to consider the interconnectedness and holistic building approach when addressing sustainable development.[4]

This is an Excerpt only and may not be copied or cited without permission, Please contact me directly to learn more.

http://www.twp.newtown.pa.us/bos/2008/20080317minws.htm
[1] United States Green Building Council. New Construction and Major Renovation Reference Guide Version 2.2 2nd Ed. September 2006. P 259.[2] http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS179589+06-Dec-2007+PRN20071206[3] http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS179589+06-Dec-2007+PRN20071206[4] http://www.newpa.com/find-and-apply-for-funding/funding-and-program-finder/funding-detail/index.aspx?progId=191