Pages

Showing posts with label International. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International. Show all posts

Friday, July 1, 2011

International Efforts Toward Sustainability - A Survey of the Rio Deceleration & the Natural Step





1. Identify and discuss the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.

The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, sometimes called the Earth Summit, was the culminating document that came out of the The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development that took place at Rio de Janeiro from 3 to 14 June 1992.[1] Consisted of 27 principles intended to guide future sustainable development around the world, the Rio Declaration reaffirms the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm on 16 June 1972, and seeks to build upon it.[2] Recognizing the integral and interdependent nature of the Earth, our home, the Rio Declaration’s first principle is both the overall statement of intent as well as a powerful statement for the whole of the international community. It states that, “human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.”[3]

The remaining 26 principles of the Rio Declaration are:
  • “Principle 2  - States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.
  • Principle 3 - The right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.
  • Principle 4 - In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it.
  • Principle 5  -  All States and all people shall cooperate in the essential task of eradicating poverty as an indispensable requirement for sustainable development, in order to decrease the disparities in standards of living and better meet the needs of the majority of the people of the world.
  • Principle 6  -  The special situation and needs of developing countries, particularly the least developed and those most environmentally vulnerable, shall be given special priority. International actions in the field of environment and development should also address the interests and needs of all countries.
  • Principle 7  -  States shall cooperate in a spirit of global partnership to conserve, protect and restore the health and integrity of the Earth's ecosystem. In view of the different contributions to global environmental degradation, States have common but differentiated responsibilities. The developed countries acknowledge the responsibility that they bear in the international pursuit to sustainable development in view of the pressures their societies place on the global environment and of the technologies and financial resources they command.
  • Principle 8  -  To achieve sustainable development and a higher quality of life for all people, States should reduce and eliminate unsustainable patterns of production and consumption and promote appropriate demographic policies.
  • Principle 9  -  States should cooperate to strengthen endogenous capacity-building for sustainable development by improving scientific understanding through exchanges of scientific and technological knowledge, and by enhancing the development, adaptation, diffusion and transfer of technologies, including new and innovative technologies.
  • Principle 10  -  Environmental issues are best handled with participation of all concerned citizens, at the relevant level. At the national level, each individual shall have appropriate access to information concerning the environment that is held by public authorities, including information on hazardous materials and activities in their communities, and the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes. States shall facilitate and encourage public awareness and participation by making information widely available. Effective access to judicial and administrative proceedings, including redress and remedy, shall be provided.
  • Principle 11  -  States shall enact effective environmental legislation. Environmental standards, management objectives and priorities should reflect the environmental and development context to which they apply. Standards applied by some countries may be inappropriate and of unwarranted economic and social cost to other countries, in particular developing countries.
  • Principle 12  -  States should cooperate to promote a supportive and open international economic system that would lead to economic growth and sustainable development in all countries, to better address the problems of environmental degradation. Trade policy measures for environmental purposes should not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade. Unilateral actions to deal with environmental challenges outside the jurisdiction of the importing country should be avoided. Environmental measures addressing transboundary or global environmental problems should, as far as possible, be based on an international consensus.
  • Principle 13  -  States shall develop national law regarding liability and compensation for the victims of pollution and other environmental damage. States shall also cooperate in an expeditious and more determined manner to develop further international law regarding liability and compensation for adverse effects of environmental damage caused by activities within their jurisdiction or control to areas beyond their jurisdiction.
  • Principle 14  -  States should effectively cooperate to discourage or prevent the relocation and transfer to other States of any activities and substances that cause severe environmental degradation or are found to be harmful to human health.
  • Principle 15  -  In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.
  • Principle 16  -  National authorities should endeavour to promote the internalization of environmental costs and the use of economic instruments, taking into account the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due regard to the public interest and without distorting international trade and investment.
  • Principle 17  -  Environmental impact assessment, as a national instrument, shall be undertaken for proposed activities that are likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment and are subject to a decision of a competent national authority.
  • Principle 18  -  States shall immediately notify other States of any natural disasters or other emergencies that are likely to produce sudden harmful effects on the environment of those States. Every effort shall be made by the international community to help States so afflicted.
  • Principle 19  -  States shall provide prior and timely notification and relevant information to potentially affected States on activities that may have a significant adverse transboundary environmental effect and shall consult with those States at an early stage and in good faith.
  • Principle 20  -  Women have a vital role in environmental management and development. Their full participation is therefore essential to achieve sustainable development.
  • Principle 21  -  The creativity, ideals and courage of the youth of the world should be mobilized to forge a global partnership in order to achieve sustainable development and ensure a better future for all.
  • Principle 22  -  Indigenous people and their communities and other local communities have a vital role in environmental management and development because of their knowledge and traditional practices. States should recognize and duly support their identity, culture and interests and enable their effective participation in the achievement of sustainable development.
  • Principle 23  -  The environment and natural resources of people under oppression, domination and occupation shall be protected.
  • Principle 24  -  Warfare is inherently destructive of sustainable development. States shall therefore respect international law providing protection for the environment in times of armed conflict and cooperate in its further development, as necessary.
  • Principle 25  -  Peace, development and environmental protection are interdependent and indivisible.
  • Principle 26  -  States shall resolve all their environmental disputes peacefully and by appropriate means in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 
  • Principle 27  -  States and people shall cooperate in good faith and in a spirit of partnership in the fulfillment of the principles embodied in this Declaration and in the further development of international law in the field of sustainable development.”[4]

According to Deborah Leipziger, “although the Rio Declaration is addressed to nation-states, it introduced key concepts that are echoed in many” of the international tools including the Global Compact. Furthermore, the Rio Declaration defined two key principles – the precautionary principle and the polluter-pays principle – that are key elements of many environmental standards.”[5]


2. Identify and discuss what is meant by the Natural Step.

According to the Natural Step website, the organization is “a not-for-profit organisation dedicated to education, advisory work and research in sustainable development.”[6] Founded in Sweden in 1989 by scientist Karl-Henrik Robèrt the Natural Step has “worked with thousands of corporations, municipalities, academic institutions and not-for-profit organisations that have proven that moving strategically toward sustainability leads to new opportunities, reduced costs, and dramatically reduced ecological and social impacts.”[7] Following a national consensus about “what is in principle needed to sustain the human civilization on earth,”[8]

In a paper that Dr. Robert wrote in 1991 entitled ‘Educating A Nation: The Natural Step’, The Natural Step is described as a “network of experts from various fields who are attempting to find out how much can be accomplished by using scientific consensus as the basis for decision-making in human society. The network includes scientists, economists, teachers, environmental activists, politicians, business leaders, artists, and others who are all contributing to a mutual effort for a future based on respect for natural laws.”[9]

The Natural Step approach to sustainability begins with four simple scientific observations:
  1. Matter and energy cannot be destroyed (the 1st Law of Thermodynamics)
  2. Matter and energy tend to spread spontaneously (entropy, the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics)
  3. Biological and economic value (quality) of matter is in its concentration and structure
  4. Net increases in material quality on Earth are generated almost entirely by the sun-driven process of photosynthesis[10]

Putting the two laws of thermodynamics together and applying them to the global environment, the following facts become apparent:
  1. All the matter that will ever exist on earth is here now (First Law).
  2. Disorder increases in all closed systems and the Earth is a closed system with respect to matter (Second Law). However, it is an open system with respect to energy since it receives energy from the sun.
  3. Sunlight is responsible for almost all increases in net material quality on the planet through photosynthesis and solar heating effects. This flow of energy from the sun creates structure and order from the disorder.[11]

Following the four simple scientific observations, The Natural Step developed Four System Conditions of Sustainability In a sustainable society, nature is not subject to systematically increasing:
  • concentrations of substances extracted from the earth's crust;
  • concentrations of substances produced by society;
  • degradation by physical means; and, in that society. . .
  • human needs are met worldwide.[12]

Mr. Robert then worked out a first version of system conditions for sustainability and a planning method that later evolved into and became known as The Natural Step Framework (or the Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development). In general, The Natural Step Framework takes people beyond the arguments of what is and is not possible; or what may be politically left or right wing. Instead, the Framework builds on a “basic understanding of what makes life possible, how our biosphere functions and how we are part of the earth’s natural systems.”[13] Rather than get lost in abstract definitions and causes, The Natural Step “builds on a platform of basic science and is designed to allow true interdisciplinary, cross sector cooperation for concrete and measurable change towards sustainability. After all, if you want to achieve ‘success’, you have to first understand what this means in real terms before you can then take strategic





[2] Ibid.
[5] Leipziger, Deborah. The Corporate Responsibility Code Book. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited, 2003. Page 308.
[7] Ibid.

Developing Ethical Supply Chains Internationally




1. Identify and discuss what is Social Accountability 8000
A global social accountability standard for working conditions, Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000) was developed by Social Accountability International (SAI). A non-governmental, multi-stakeholder organization whose mission is to advance the human rights of workers around the world, SA8000 partners to advance the human rights of workers and to eliminate sweatshops by promoting ethical working conditions, labor rights, corporate social responsibility and social dialogue.[1] As one of the world's leading social compliance training organizations, SAI has provided “training to over 20,000 people, including factory and farm managers, workers, brand compliance officers, auditors, labor inspectors, trade union representatives and other worker rights advocates. Today SA8000 certification covers over 2,300 facilities in 62 countries, across 66 industries, and over 1.3 million employees. Many more workplaces are involved in programs using SA8000 and SAI programs as guides for improvement.”[2]

Created in 1997 by Social Accountability International, Social Accountability Accreditation Services certify facilities that conform to the requirements of SA8000. Predicated on the principles garnered through “thirteen international human rights conventions and developed through a multi-stakeholder process, SA8000 is a tool to help apply these norms to practical work-life situations. SA8000 contains eight core elements including health and safety, working hours, child labor, forced labor, discrimination, freedom of association and collective bargaining, wages, and discipline.”[3]
SA8000 is not without its critics. A paper published in 2008 by three Harvard University professors attempted to ascertain the quantifiable value of SA8000 among other international certification standards and corporate codes of conduct. According to Michael Hiscox, Claire Schwartz, and Michael Toffel, while the number of organizations becoming certified under SA 8000 and similar codes continues to rise, “a fierce debate is raging about whether these codes represent substantive efforts to improve working conditions or merely symbolic efforts that allow organizations to score marketing points and counteract stakeholder pressure by merely filing some paperwork.”[4] While the summation of the Harvard study was inclusive as to the value of SA8000 and similar standards, the professors provide ways to improve such standards so that a more quantifiable analysis could be divined.


2. Discuss the types of alliances which can be developed to promote ethical supply chains.
There are several institutes and organizations that promote ethical supply chains around the world. One of those organizations is the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI). ETI “is a ground-breaking alliance of companies, trade unions and voluntary organizations. We work in partnership to improve the lives of workers across the globe who make or grow consumer goods - everything from tea to T-shirts, from flowers to footballs.”[5] Deborah Leipziger describes the ETI as a tripartite, “consisting of membership groups from three sectors: companies, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) and trade unions. It is funded by the UK government’s Department for International Development and its members, which include NGOs and companies, which pay dues.”[6] ETI members include over “50 corporations including: Marks & Spencer, Sainsbury’s, Gap and Inditex, along with NGOs such as Save the Children, the FairTrade Foundation and the international trade union movement.”[7] According to the Ethical Trading Iniatitive:
Ethical trade means that retailers, brands and their suppliers take responsibility for improving the working conditions of the people who make the products they sell. Most of these workers are employed by supplier companies around the world, many of them based in poor countries where laws designed to protect workers' rights are inadequate or not enforced. Companies with a commitment to ethical trade adopt a code of labour practice that they expect all their suppliers to work towards. Such codes address issues like wages, hours of work, health and safety and the right to join free trade unions.[8]

According to Michael Levin, author of an article entitled ‘Building an Ethical Supply Chain’, affirms the work of the ETI by saying that “Being an ethical company isn’t enough anymore. These days, leading brands are judged by the company they keep. Consumers, investors, business partners, regulators, and media organizations now expect a company and its entire supply chain to be ethical.”[9] While many may dismiss this sentiment noting that it is either too expensive or too complicated, Mr. Levin asserts that “sooner or later, every company is bound to find itself part of a supply chain that experiences a significant ethics or compliance violation. When this happens, chances are great that the biggest brand in the chain will get stuck with most of the blame.”[10] While ETI is by no means the only organization looking to make a difference in this area,[11] they are a key participant in the global alliance promoting an ethical supply chain.


3. Under what conditions should products be manufactured so as to ensure that workers' rights are being respected?
While there are many standards that speak to the conditions that are acceptable for workers around the globe, the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) has compiled a very sensible and comprehensive standard that the organization considers the ‘Base Code’. According to the Base Code, there are nine fundamental rights that should be respected of all workers in the manufacturing sector. ETI’s website states that the provisions of the Base Code constitute “minimum and not maximum standards and this code should not be used to prevent companies from exceeding these standards. Companies applying this code are expected to comply with national and other applicable law and, where the provisions of law and this Base Code address the same subject, to apply that provision which affords the greater protection”[12] The nine codes are:


  1. Employment is freely chosen
  2. Freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining are respected
  3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic
  4. Child labour shall not be used
  5. Living wages are paid
  6. Working hours are not excessive
  7. No discrimination is practiced
  8. Regular employment is provided
  9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed[13]

The first code refers to the free ability of an employee to enter into employment and leave employment as the employee desires. And that no forced labor is exerted on any employee. The second code refers to the collective rights of the employees. That they be allowed the ability to associate, be able to form unions, and general bargaining rights. The third code refers to providing the employees appropriate safety and hygienic conditions to conduct their work. This code includes access to clean restrooms as well as health and safety training among other things. The fourth code refers to the unequivocal nonuse of child labor. The fifth code refers to, what is called the ‘living wage’. While not quantifiable, the living wage often provides at least the minimum wage as required by law, but generally speaks to the wage that would be consistent to adequately provide for yourself. The sixth code refers to having regular working hours. Similar to the living wage, not overworking employees is a combination of national laws and common sense. The seventh code refers to their being no discrimination being practiced in the work environment. The eighth code refers to a legal and ethical relationship between company and employee. Without this protection, it is possible for employees to be maintained as indefinite contract workers instead of full-time employees with benefits, or to be kept as an ‘apprentice’ long after you have learned your trade, etc. The final and ninth code refers broadly to the ideals inherent in the ‘Base Code’. Stating that ‘no harsh or inhumane treatment be allowed’ is the fundamental tenant of ETI’s code and is both a benchmark as well as a caution against any discrimination or unethical treatment that is not expressly stated in the Base Code.





Codes & Standards for Sustainable Operations Internationally


While there are many international codes and standards relevant to human rights and social responsibility available, presented below is a sampling of some of the various documents that are generally found:

OECD Guidelines to Multinational Enterprises:
According to the OECD website, the guidelines for multinational enterprises around the world are, “recommendations addressed by governments to multinational enterprises operating in or from adhering countries. They provide voluntary principles and standards for responsible business conduct in areas such as employment and industrial relations, human rights, environment, information disclosure, combating bribery, consumer interests, science and technology, competition, and taxation.”[i] Billed as the, “most comprehensive instrument in existence today for corporate responsibility multilaterally agreed by governments,”[ii] the OECD’s guidelines are represented in all regions of the world and account for 85% of foreign direct investment.[iii]

ISO 26000
The stated aim of ISO 26000 is “to be a first step in helping all types of organization in both the public and private sectors to… achieve the benefits of operating in a socially responsible manner.”[iv] The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 26000 offers a framework for socially responsible behavior. However, there are no requirements and, therefore, in contrast to ISO management system standards, is not certifiable. ISO 26000 addresses “seven core subjects of social responsibility defined in the standard, including: scope, terms and definitions, understanding social responsibility, principles of social responsibility, recognizing social responsibility and engaging stakeholders, guidance on social responsibility core subjects, and guidance on integrating, social responsibility throughout an organization.[v]

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Adopted by the United Nations in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights acknowledges “whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”[vi] Representing the first global expression of rights to which all human beings are inherently entitled, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights consists of 30 articles. The first and arguably most notable article reads, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”[vii]

The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights
Formed in 2000, the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights was created “in response to the concerns of governments, extractive companies, and civil society over difficult operating environments that created challenges to both security and human rights.” [viii] Applicable stakeholders involved with the formation of the Voluntary Principles include: U.S. Department of State; the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office; oil, mining, and energy companies; and human rights, labor, and corporate responsibility NGOs and provide “practical guidance that will strengthen human rights safeguards in company security arrangements in the extractive sector.”[ix] Today, participants in the Voluntary Principles include “5 governments (Canada, Netherlands, Norway, U.K., and U.S.); 18 oil, gas, and mining companies; and 8 international NGOs.”[x]

The Norms on the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations
Approved in 2003 by a UN sub-committee, the Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations was considered, at the time, to be the “most recent comprehensive and concise global document dealing with companies’ human rights obligations and responsibilities.”[xi] While this new approval by the UN did not introduce any new obligations for transnational corporations, it did “reaffirm and reinforce the declarations that have been made so far with regard to human rights responsibilities of business enterprises (e. g. the OECD-guidelines on multinational enterprises and the UN Global Compact Initiative, etc.) and concentrate the core guidelines and standards in this new concise document.”[xii] The Norms like many other documents on global human rights is no binding and is, at best, asset of guidelines or recommendations.

Identify and discuss the Global Compact's Principles
Launched in 2000, the global compact principles is an initiative by the UN to encourage businesses worldwide to adopt sustainable and socially responsible policies, and to report on their implementation publically.[xiii] Offering ten principles in the areas of human rights, labor, the environment and anti-corruption, the compact is the world's largest corporate citizenship initiative. While voluntary, this program has over 8,000 signatories based in more than 135 countries.[xiv] With regard to human rights, the compact states that “businesses should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights and make sure that they are not complicit in human rights abuses.”[xv] For labor the compact states that “businesses should uphold the freedom of association; recognize the right to collective bargaining; eliminate all terms of forced and compulsory labor; abolish child labor; eliminate discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.”[xvi] Similarly, where businesses relate to the environment, “businesses should support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges; undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility and encourage the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.”[xvii] Finally, the compact notes that, with regard to anti-corruption, “businesses should work against corruption in all its forms including extortion and bribery.”[xviii] While it is not clear all the impacts that the UN global compact has had since its ratification in New York in 2000, Mark Tran is a firm believer that CSR and the compact is helping grow and improve the least developed countries. According to a recent article in the English news agency the Guardian, The Istanbul conference on LDCs in May of 2011 heard individuals “making the case for social responsibility in companies in LDCs, through the Global Compact Local Network.”[xix] For example, a textile and manufacturing company in India “made a commitment not to use child labor and has a written anti-corruption policy. The company also reuses effluent water from toilets used by 8,000 workers, which, combined with a rainwater harvesting system, saves 135 million litres of underground water each year.”[xx] Another company in India “shifted to energy-efficient light bulbs it cut electricity use by 80%; it also offers free medical care to poorer workers.”[xxi] This trend extends beyond India, “one of Uganda's biggest employers, has struck a partnership with its growers, providing a matching fund for roads, schools and other infrastructure. Another company in Uganda is using “local farmers to supply sorghum, which has reduced barley imports, benefiting 100,000 farmers.”[xxii]

What is the role of companies in protecting the right to security of their employees?

According to Business-Humanrights.org The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) are a set of “non-binding principles created to assist extractive companies to balance security concerns with human rights.”[xxiii] Launched in 2000, participants in the VP include 7 states, 9 NGOs, 17 companies and 3 organizations with observer status (as of May 2010).[xxiv] Developed in response to reports of human rights abuses allegedly committed by security providers contracted by the extractive industry, the principles in the VPs apply to interactions with both public and private security forces. The UN global compact frames the dilemma of human rights and security using this question, “How does a company ensure respect for the human rights of local communities when circumstances dictate that they must rely on the protection of public security forces with a history of committing human rights violations?”[xxv] The UN website goes on to say that “companies will often prefer to rely on public security providers for protection, for reasons of costs and accountability. This will only be the case, however, where such providers are characterized by high levels of professionalism, legitimate government control, legal oversight and respect for human rights. Ironically, this will generally be in areas where no such protection is required.”[xxvi] Conversely, “where public security provision is imperative (for example in areas of weak governance, conflict and post-conflict conditions), companies are more likely to enter into relationships with security forces with questionable human rights records. In some operational environments, enlisting a public security provider might be an attractive choice to protect company personnel and assets.”[xxvii] To help resolve this issue for transnational corporations, the UN global compact has developed suggestions for responsible business. The seven suggestions are: 1. Adhere to the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, 2. Develop multilateral security agreements, 3. Use influence to promote respect for human rights, 4. Consider use of private armed security providers, 5. Support human rights training, 6. Establish grievance mechanisms, 7. Promote community liaison committees.





[i] http://www.oecd.org/department/0,2688,en_2649_34889_1_1_1_1_1,00.html[ii] http://www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3746,en_2649_34889_2397532_1_1_1_1,00.html[iii] http://www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3746,en_2649_34889_2397532_1_1_1_1,00.html[iv]http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_and_leadership_standards/social_responsibility/sr_discovering_iso26000.htm[v]http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/management_and_leadership_standards/social_responsibility/sr_discovering_iso26000.htm#std-6[vi] http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml[vii] http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml[viii] http://www.state.gov/g/drl/lbr/vp/[ix] http://www.state.gov/g/drl/lbr/vp/[x] http://www.state.gov/g/drl/lbr/vp/www.voluntaryprinciples.org.[xi] http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:mU9X1SU8QYoJ:www.fes-globalization.org/geneva/documents/UN_Norms/25March04_UN-Norms_Background.pdf+Norms+on+the+Responsibilities+of+Transnational+Corporations&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgWmHF_1S8WA0lAfSJdHuK-2vjP-B3_R0-S1BC2SECUzmxu06xTme06GHqIrK4F9psgV4BsoN8BqicF8jXyhzf0gtpNV6eEzoUR6Ws55cAMt0c1Ny2vCE0GTyA8iU6kF9C89B2q&sig=AHIEtbQSjVeIdJpoIEWuJzw7wBcVPdLVyA[xii] Ibid.[xiii] http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html[xiv] http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/may/13/least-developed-countries-un-global-compact[xv] Ibid.[xvi] Ibid.[xvii] Ibid.[xviii] Ibid.[xix] http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/may/13/least-developed-countries-un-global-compact[xx] Ibid.[xxi] Ibid.[xxii] Ibid.[xxiii] http://www.business-humanrights.org/ConflictPeacePortal/Specialinitiatives/VoluntaryPrinciples[xxiv] Ibid.[xxv] http://human-rights.unglobalcompact.org/dilemmas/security-forces-and-human-rights/[xxvi] Ibid.[xxvii] Ibid.